newtralize | deerlyBeloved Profile

deerlyBeloved Profile

deerlyBeloved: FantasticBeast

Is that a beast in your pocket or are you just happy to see me? ;)

Meek in the streets, but possibly a beast in the sheets. It's the quiet ones that are the most likely to be the wildest in bed. This fine specimen doesn't know, since he's a virgin, but that doesn't mean he isn't willing to have a grand ol' time either. What this man needs is someone who can tame the wilds of his heart and bring out his primal needs and the wild beast within.

He may seem a bit shy, but he'll surely bloom under the right circumstances if you get what I mean.

Like a true Hufflepuff, he's loyal at heart and a hard worker. He'll surely show that hard work where you want him to.

PS: He turns 30 on the 24th. Give him a night to remember.

( Newt Scamander | 30 | M | Wild like his creatures )

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I actually have no idea what you mean by other pockets, but the context clues based off anatomy and the rest of that bloody awful profile gives me enough to know what's being implied.

Absolutely mortifying. As though I would embarrass someone and myself to ask such a thing.

You're certainly not the type. Hell, even I'd have to be pretty wasted to use that sort of line on anyone.

I imagine you would be a little more tasteful with your words. You seem to be more on the charming side than vulgar at the very least.

Typically, yes. Though I can be quite vulgar if I want to be.

That wasn't an invitation to actually start being vulgar, I hope you realize.

Somehow I don't know that I could with you.

I don't know what that says about me, honestly. I think I should be relieved? I'd probably just be terribly mortified otherwise.

Relieved works. By the way, if it makes you feel any better I seem to have a profile, too.

That absolutely does not make me feel better. We don't have these kind of things in the 1920s! The idea that people make profiles with information that might not even be honest to try and date others just seem rather ridiculous to me.

Phones do only what they were invented to do. Make calls. I'm not a bird. I don't need to make calls with some mating call to attract others!!

Of course in your time weren't people scandalized by knee caps?

Time change, Newt. You've just had the unfortunate pleasure of being shoved forward almost a century. To be honest, I'm not a big user of mobile phones. Even back home I didn't use it as much as others of my generation. I have more important things to do with my time than stare at a screen.

Have you never seen a flapper dress before? We are well far from being scandalized by an exposed knee.

We don't typically use a lot of muggle invention. I don't know many who had a landline in their home. I didn't have one. We always could communicate with floo powder if necessary or something. I guess we were more into interacting face to face.

That's my preference, too. You lose a lot by communicating over some device. I'd much prefer it face to face.

You do strike me as someone who likes to be among people.

It's more personal. Interacting face to face.

Very much so. There's something more gratifying about actually being around people instead of just talking at them remotely.

That is a sentiment that I think I've only started to appreciate very recently. I can't say I had much of an opinion about socializing with others other than that I wasn't fond of it at all.

Seems like you've been growing progressively more comfortable with it.

I still prefer creatures, don't get me wrong.

There are people that are an exception to the norm though.

I'm hoping that I fall under that category.

[Newt doesn't have to think about Eliot being the exception to the norm.

He has to think about how much the other means to him and that is some slippery slope.] Quite. I cannot think of someone else o the top of that list, really.

I'm flattered. That must mean I'm doing something right.

I thought it quite obvious that I enjoy your company. I can't imagine what you would have to manage for me to change my mind otherwise.

Oh something absolutely terrible, I'm sure.

I don't think it possible for you to do something terrible to me. At least willingly.

Intent really matters in a place like this.

Thank you for recognizing that. No, I'd never do something deliberately.

I know. So this really is a silly hypothetical.

[Look, the other could have killed him already. He thinks the other would have to be successful and be deliberate at this point.

Or intend to hurt him. It really had to be deliberate and of Eliot's own doing though.]

(no subject)

spectacularlyhighking - 2019-03-25 03:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

newtralize - 2019-03-25 06:14 (UTC) - Expand

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only